Lynn Hatcher McGary - Master Teacher
#4 The Lost Art of Theologically-Informed Parenting
From a Parenting Seminar Lynn presented in 2004
PART 1:
Today I will give two stories from the childhood life of our son, John, to illustrate how to parent according to theological understanding of behaviors in children.
Parenting with biblical understanding has become a lost art. This is clear from the breakdown of the family among those who are or claim to be Christians. Especially disturbing is that this breakdown is now common among church leadership families.
Two reactions have occurred to fuel this breakdown.
Moral laxness in parenting is one reaction to moral decline in the general culture.
Moralism is the “corrective” reaction by many well-meaning Christians to moral laxness.
Both are spiritually dangerous.
One creates rampant and destructive hedonism or a materialistic pursuit of happiness.
The other one creates an austere stoicism or a well-disguised and smug form of self-righteousness..
[Both of these extremes are discussed when Jesus told “The Story of Two Sons” – often labeled “The Prodigal Son.” Unfortunately, the moralist, the good son, was in fact, the smug self-righteous son – the very sad reality the story was pointing out to the Pharisees.]
So what is a parent to do?
Rediscover the theological basis for parenting!
First, rediscover the meaning of humans being made in the image of God. Evolutionary thinking has slipped in among Christians in both categories discussed above. Children are seen in the false dichotomy of either acting based on nature or nurture.
Lax parents will often say, “Well boys will be boys.” That is, their (sinful) nature “makes” them do bad things and there is little you can do about it – they just have to grow out of it. So pray for them.” This is the Nature response.
Moralist parents will often say, “If you spank them enough and demand obedience at all times and instantly, or if you give them a completely protected environment, then you will shape them to do the right things.” This is the Nurture response.
Both of these are expressions of the same false theology or humanistic philosophy: Children (passive actors on some stage of existence) are acted upon by outside forces (the fate of nature or parents) and that determines who and what they will be. These are simply twin forms of determinism – a very subtle form of evolutionary thinking in Christian sub-culture.
I want to explore only one aspect of how children express being made in God’s image for this part of the discussion. Later we will explore several other ways in which children are made in God’s image and what that means in parenting.
For those who are getting anxious about how to correct behaviors that need correcting – be patient and disciplined yourself! You must first focus on guiding the right behaviors before reacting to correct wrong behaviors.
God did it that way with Adam in the Genesis story. Directions: Name the animals, have children, have dominion, care for the garden, eat the food provided and follow one prohibition.
Humans made in the image of God have a God-given command and desire to have dominion over their environment.
Children are no less image-bearers of God than adults.
John was about two years old. One evening I heard him screaming in anger in the kitchen. I quickly stepped into the kitchen to see what was happening. There he was pulling on a kitchen cabinet drawer handle and screaming out in frustration. Why?
He had been going along the cabinet drawers and pulling them out a little ways and then pushing them closed again.
He was learning patterns of physical realities and control – having dominion over his environment – a good thing.
However, the drawer handle he was pulling on while screaming was not a drawer but the false front on the sink cabinet. It looked like all the other drawer fronts and due to thoughtless design it had a regular handle on it too. His frustration was over the patterned expectation he had experienced with the other drawers. He was frustrated with both the “drawer” not opening and his inability to get it to open.
My reaction was not to tell him to quit pulling or to quit yelling. It was hard for him to grasp the idea at first but with a little time and patience I was able to show him the problem. Together we discovered how each drawer handle had more than just a front, but also a drawer. Then we got down under the sink cabinet and looked to see that there was no drawer to this front and handle.
By repeating this action and showing him the difference again, he was able to understand the difference and never again did he react this way. He understood well enough this one time to never pull on the sink front handle again when he played at opening and closing drawers.
One other time, in an oft recounted story in that same kitchen, I came into the kitchen to find John, still only two years old, sitting on top of the refrigerator! He was just sitting there looking around and down at me! It was obvious that he was happy and contented.
I recognized that this was his act of having dominion over his environment. Similar to why anyone climbs a mountain or drives along the Skyline Drive in Virginia – the views!
Instead of scolding him because of the real danger in this activity, I complimented him on climbing up to see better. He reached out for me to take him down. Instead I showed him and guided him on how to turn around, dangle his feet back over the refrigerator and climb down the same way he got up! He learned how to climb down.
Not in every case will this be possible but a parent should look and think before missing the teachable moments.
I talked about how he could fall off and hurt himself. Interestingly, as far as we ever knew he never tried that climb again.
Be careful not to squelch your child’s God-given desire to have dominion over his environment. It is true a child will test a parent’s dominion over them, but be wise to recognize the difference between abject disobedience and learning the idea of the limits of their own dominion, which dominion you are properly and continually reinforcing as an expression of their personhood, made in the image of God.
NEXT SATURDAY: Part 2
Recognize the theologically informed purposes of the “law of obedience,” in the family.